From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Feb 14 21:51:13 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA14312
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 21:51:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA14306
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 21:51:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.shockwave.com (localhost.shockwave.com [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA05414; Wed, 14 Feb 1996 21:49:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199602150549.VAA05414@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com>
cc: FreeBSD-current <current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: /usr/local/libexec vs /usr/local/sbin 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Feb 1996 17:49:31 PST."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.960214174739.23733A-100000@nervosa.com> 
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 21:49:57 -0800
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Yes, you're absolutely correct, UNLESS they are standalone daemons, in
which case, sbin is correct (e.g. sendmail, inetd)

  From: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com>
  Subject: /usr/local/libexec vs /usr/local/sbin
  Shouldn't local daemon's, i.e. identd, imapd, go into /usr/local/libexec 
  rather than /usr/local/sbin? Also, shouldn't local man pages go into 
  /usr/local/share/man? I'm just trying to establish some consistency.
  
  Chris Layne,
  coredump@nervosa.com.