From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Aug 23 4:11:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from borja.sarenet.es (borja.sarenet.es [192.148.167.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E4437B409 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 04:11:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from borjamar@sarenet.es) Received: from there (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by borja.sarenet.es (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f7NBANV22497; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:10:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from borjamar@sarenet.es) Message-Id: <200108231110.f7NBANV22497@borja.sarenet.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Borja Marcos To: "Lawrence Farr" Subject: Re: 3ware stuff not ready for heavy duty useage-followup Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:10:22 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <004101c12bc3$81e74900$c80aa8c0@lfarr> In-Reply-To: <004101c12bc3$81e74900$c80aa8c0@lfarr> Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thursday 23 August 2001 13:05, you wrote: > Anyone got any ideas for tuning this? Or is that it performance wise? > How about splitting the drives to 4 stripe sets, and Raid 5 across them > with vinum? =09Raid5 is fast reading (same as a stripping) but writes are not so fast= , as=20 the system needs to calculate and write parity data. =09Borja. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message