From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 12 12:42:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6502316A468 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91F913C457 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp121-45-133-39.lns11.adl6.internode.on.net [121.45.133.39]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1CCflr4008189 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:11:47 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:11:42 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <79029E40-6E43-4482-8E39-D1DE49C8C53A@anduin.net> In-Reply-To: <79029E40-6E43-4482-8E39-D1DE49C8C53A@anduin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart133648428.REUqbjKGI0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200802122311.43247.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.212 () BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Eirik =?utf-8?q?=C3=98verby?= Subject: Re: UFS snapshot weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:42:03 -0000 --nextPart133648428.REUqbjKGI0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Eirik =D8verby wrote: > I am at a total loss here. Is it re-using the first snapshot I ever > made of this filesystem, even though I've removed it? Didn't I > understand how to create/remove snapshots? Is this a bug? Sure the old md isn't hanging around by mistake or some such? I have had people recover many files using the snapshot tool in ports=20 (plus a small symlink maker for samba access) and haven't noticed=20 issues like this. On the otherhand I find it can take a long time to make a snapshot=20 (during which time no FS access is allowed). =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart133648428.REUqbjKGI0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBHsZQH5ZPcIHs/zowRArXIAJ9Rb1nfONYM4SM/PZw5b8N/0v8rYgCfQQ74 VVosoH/fyO/2DevJKVCP/nI= =tEaq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart133648428.REUqbjKGI0--