From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 16 16:41:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F7D16A4D0; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:41:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freebee.digiware.nl (dsl390.iae.nl [212.61.63.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6E343D31; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:41:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from dual (dual [212.61.27.71]) by freebee.digiware.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i6GGdesD095234; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:39:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Message-ID: <0b8301c46b52$96931b50$471b3dd4@digiware.nl> From: "Willem Jan Withagen" To: "Robert Watson" References: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:33:12 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spin lock sched lock held by 0xffffff007b712250 for > 5 seconds X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:41:18 -0000 From: "Robert Watson" > On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > > > After todays kernelbuild the system seem to be a lot better... > > It can take quite some buildworld abuse, but still: > > > > spin lock sched lock held by 0xffffff007b712250 for > 5 seconds > > panic: spin lock held too long > > cpuid = 1; > > KDB: enter: panic > > > > But I'm not shure what I could/should do now, since the KDB > > introduction. Normally I'd expect to see: db> > > We have trouble entering the debugger when in a critical section/and or > have sched_lock held -- I think this is because we try to halt the other > CPUs and that gets nastily stuck in some form. We need to fix this. > > This could well be a symptom of some of the other hangs we've been seeing, > and I've seen similar things on my test box with preemption enabled. To be honest, it is a lot better than at the beginning of the week. Anything I can do to help debug either of them?? Suggestions where/what to look for? --WjW