Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:11:05 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Subject: Re: changes to base system DNS Message-ID: <5324C1E9.6040802@rcn.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> "rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/*" on the old and new systems
> and compare the locations of named vs. local_unbound?
On the current system, named comes up as number 74.
Would someone who uses only unbound report how it works for them?
Better yet - someone who's using port.bind?
> So it depends on what capability you are looking for as to whether it
starts earlier or later. (No easy answers here.)
Short version: this system is authoritative for its zone, so a
caching-only resolver is no good.
Using system bind worked fine; everybody found everything they
needed at the right time.
I don't grok the rcorder system: it is my impression that
everything in /etc/rc.d is provessed independently and before
/usr/local/etc/rc.d. If that's true, then it seems like named might
start after things that need its services.
Respectfully,
Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5324C1E9.6040802>