Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 01:11:41 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196228] [patch] sysutils/zfs-periodic deleting snapshots fails Message-ID: <bug-196228-7788-oDnEqr2pU9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-196228-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-196228-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D196228 Harald Schmalzbauer <bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #174114|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #11 from Harald Schmalzbauer <bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de> --- Created attachment 223625 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D223625&action= =3Dedit fix+enhance siplicity of sysutils/zfs-periodic Happy consumer of my own diff for years... Today, briefly checked upstream and found stalled development (https://github.com/ross/zfs-periodic). Since I need a bit more sophisticated "skip" logic, I'd like to share my overhaul. Kept previous and necessary old-dataset-delete fix! Tried to preserve the idea that a user's pool defintion (in periodic.conf) = must result in snaphot-rolling for each un-skipped dataset. Introduce handling of zfs user property "periodic:skip" to complement *_zfs_snapshot_skip parameter. Modify pkg-message to hopefully document the enhanced features sufficiently. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-196228-7788-oDnEqr2pU9>