Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Nov 1996 12:35:24 -0700
From:      Steve Passe <smp@csn.net>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com>
Cc:        Erich Boleyn <erich@uruk.org>, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Steve Passe <smp@csn.net>, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Pentium CPU steppings 
Message-ID:  <199611291935.MAA29466@clem.systemsix.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Nov 1996 01:42:00 %2B0800." <199611291742.BAA19182@spinner.DIALix.COM> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

different P5s I have:

---
1:
FreeBSD 2.1.0-RELEASE #9: Wed Aug 14 20:42:01 MDT 1996
CPU: 86-MHz Pentium 735\\90 or 815\\100 (Pentium-class CPU)
  Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0x521  Stepping=1
>>>  Features=0x1bf<FPU,VME,PSE,MCE,CX8,APIC>

$ fdiv
x = 4195835.000000, y = 3145727.000000, result = 256.000000, FDIV BUG PRESENT

---
2:
FreeBSD 2.1.5-RELEASE #0: Thu Jul 25 21:17:19 MDT 1996
CPU: 133-MHz Pentium 735\\90 or 815\\100 (Pentium-class CPU)
  Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0x52c  Stepping=12
>>>  Features=0x1bf<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8>

$ fdiv
x = 4195835.000000, y = 3145727.000000, result = 0.000000, FDIV OK

---
3:
FreeBSD 3.0-SMP #0: Fri Nov 29 10:03:58 MST 1996
CPU: Pentium (586-class CPU)
  Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0x52c  Stepping=12
  Features=0x3bf<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8,APIC>

3 % fdiv
x = 4195835.000000, y = 3145727.000000, result = 0.000000, FDIV OK

Processors:     APIC ID Version State           Family  Model   Step    Flags
                 0       0x11    BSP, usable     5       2       1       0x07bf
                 1       0x11    AP, usable      5       2       1       0x07bf

---
note that both 1 & 2 have a feature value of 1bf, neither
of which have the APIC bit set (bit #9).  2.1.0 claims the
90mHz chip has an APIC, which I didn't expect, while 2.1.5
claims it doesn't have an APIC, which is consistant with 1bf.
However this is a fairly new chip so I think it really does have
an APIC.

also note that the kernel says stepping 12 for #3, but mptable always says 
stepping 1.  I previously said that I think certain MP BIOS report
a BAD value for the CPU APIC version number, I now add CPU stepping as
reported by some MP BIOS (and thus mptable) as being suspect.

--
Steve Passe	| powered by
smp@csn.net	|            FreeBSD




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611291935.MAA29466>