From owner-cvs-all  Sat Dec 18  8:55:34 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AADE615833; Sat, 18 Dec 1999 08:55:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA04647;
	Sat, 18 Dec 1999 09:55:09 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id JAA91056; Sat, 18 Dec 1999 09:55:09 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199912181655.JAA91056@harmony.village.org>
To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen fts.c 
Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 18 Dec 1999 08:45:01 EST."
		<Pine.BSF.4.10.9912180843120.74555-100000@green.dyndns.org> 
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912180843120.74555-100000@green.dyndns.org>  
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 09:55:09 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

In message <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912180843120.74555-100000@green.dyndns.org> Brian Fundakowski Feldman writes:
: What do you object to?  In my analysis of the changes, I didn't notice
: anything bad.  The only difference I can think of objecting to would
: be reversion to using realloc() instead of reallocf(), but the code
: works the same either way.

Using realloc instead of reallocf introduces a memory leak when the
system can't realloc the memory.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message