From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 20 11:01:47 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA04556 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 20 May 1996 11:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from io.org (io.org [198.133.36.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA04548 for ; Mon, 20 May 1996 11:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zot.io.org (taob@zot.io.org [198.133.36.82]) by io.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA19510 for ; Mon, 20 May 1996 14:01:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 14:00:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Tao To: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS-L Subject: NE2000 Plus not probed correctly? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk A friend of mine has a no-name ("Ether-16+") ISA Ethernet controller that claims to be an NE2000+ card, but purports to run with any NE2000 driver. The Novell-supplied drivers on the same machine (booting into both DOS and OS/2 Warp) recognize and use the card properly. It is configured for IRQ 12, port 0x300 and iomem 0xd0000 in Novell. The ed0 driver is also configured with the same settings, but the device probe on boot fails to locate the card ("ed0 not found at 0x300"). We've tried different IRQ's and port addresses to no avail. This is on a 2.1.0R machine, 100-MHz Cyrix 586. Any ideas? -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org, taob@ican.net) Systems and Network Administrator, Internet Canada Corp. "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"