From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 28 02:16:29 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE3916A419 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 02:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mrkvrg@acm.org) Received: from xena.bway.net (xena.bway.net [216.220.96.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBB813C48D for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 02:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mrkvrg@acm.org) Received: (qmail 35440 invoked by uid 0); 28 Oct 2007 01:49:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gecko3.bs.net) (216.220.115.118) by smtp.bway.net with SMTP; 28 Oct 2007 01:49:47 -0000 From: mv To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:49:46 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <4722BBC8.9060902@gmail.com> <2fd864e0710262134u6ea0fb97offb687fe68e4e420@mail.gmail.com> <20071028003344.GA2491@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20071028003344.GA2491@kobe.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710272149.47052.mrkvrg@acm.org> Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , Astrodog Subject: Re: evil idea X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 02:16:29 -0000 Hello, Would installing Freebsd i386 within a jail on an amd64 host solve his problem? I have been running amd64 since it was first released and am quite pleased with its performance and stability. However, as a desktop there are still a number of programs that are only available on i386 and for a number of reasons I would prefer to run them within a jail. I've searched the Internet and have not found anybody who has done it. My guess is that running a i386 program within a jail would run faster and perhaps be more stable than running the same program within qemu. Any tips on desirability, feasibility or how to do it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks On Sat, 27 October 2007 20:33:44 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2007-10-26 23:34, Astrodog wrote: > >On 10/26/07, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > >> I am running amd64 8-CURRENT and there are a few i386 only ports that I > >> absolutely must have installed and at the same time since I have 4 GB of > >> RAM all kinds of bizarreness is created if I "downgrade" to i386. So > >> here is the idea: use qemu to create a virtual version of my machine > >> (with less then 2GB or RAM) and install i386 8-CURRENT on it (I want to > >> use -CURRENT for all my installs) > >> > >> Any thing I should watch out for here (I know I need to use NFS or > >> something like it to share files between the host and guest OS's) > > > > There's actually a known system that will work for this. You can use > > your existing swap partition, as an "extra" root partition, installing > > there, then booting to that, then rebuild/install to your original > > partition. Its the same basic idea as the method for updating from > > 4.x->7.x, and should be on the lists. (Note to docs, might be worth > > putting it somewhere.) > > I don't think Aryeh wants to "install i386 over his current amd64". > > What he seems to be asking is if he can run *two* versions, one of > them as a virtualized host under qemu. That should work, AFAIK. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"