From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 22 21:34:52 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062E11065679;
	Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:34:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu
	[128.208.78.105])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FF18FC1C;
	Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:34:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu
	[127.0.0.1])
	by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id
	n8MLYpYv033724; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: (from sgk@localhost)
	by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id
	n8MLYpWi033723; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sgk)
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:34:51 -0700
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Gregory Shapiro <gshapiro@gshapiro.net>
Message-ID: <20090922213451.GC84817@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl>
	<20090922135435.36a3d40e@lazybytes.org>
	<4AB90448.9020706@FreeBSD.org>
	<19e9a5dc0909221014o14e88c96ubf32142b85d781d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090922173517.GB63149@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<20090922200449.GL19207@rugsucker.local>
	<19e9a5dc0909221329j5757c3f7kc23e94ea8f26a05@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090922204356.GM19207@rugsucker.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090922204356.GM19207@rugsucker.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi@gmail.com>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BIND in the base (Was: Re: tmux(1) in base)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:34:52 -0000

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:43:56PM -0700, Gregory Shapiro wrote:
> > My apologies for the inconveniences or offenses I might unwittingly
> > have caused you.
> 
> Oh no, none necessary at all and I am sorry if my reply to Steve was
> misinterpreted.  I wanted to both thank Steve for the recognition and
> also agree with you -- who I am doesn't enter into the picture, all that
> matters is what is best for the project.  The only other factor that
> enters into the decision making is if sendmail is being actively and
> properly maintained.

Your last line was my point, which apparentily has been missed.
sendmail is actively maintained by you (and Sendmail, Inc.).  If
sendmail is replaced by dma, will it receive the same level of care?
I guess this is considered to be a dubious concern by some.

-- 
Steve