From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 16:53:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57804106566B for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55898FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA24083; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:53:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <503CF7A1.6070105@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 19:53:53 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120730 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Trent Nelson References: <20120824011517.GJ42732@snakebite.org> <503CD4F1.6060001@FreeBSD.org> <503CDD4E.6050902@FreeBSD.org> <20120828164323.GA25443@snakebite.org> In-Reply-To: <20120828164323.GA25443@snakebite.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: chmod -h 000x against symlink has bizarre results on ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:53:59 -0000 on 28/08/2012 19:43 Trent Nelson said the following: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:01:34AM -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Will you be able to test the following patch? > > Sure. Just out of interest, is it FreeBSD-specific? Or likely to > affect other ZFS platforms as well? Just out of interest, is it > FreeBSD-specific? Or likely to affect other ZFS platforms as well? > Just out of interest, is it FreeBSD-specific? Or likely to affect > other ZFS platforms as well? Just out of interest, is it FreeBSD > -specific? Or likely to affect other ZFS platforms as well? Likely to affect other ZFS platforms in some form or shape. Likely to affect other ZFS platforms in some form or shape. Likely to affect other ZFS platforms in some form or shape. Likely to affect other ZFS platforms in some form or shape. :-) At least if those hold true: - I correctly understood what's going on - the platforms use the same ZFS core; e.g. I can't say anything about non-public ZFS code in Oracle Solaris Also, for the bug to reveal itself there should be at least two variable sized attributes of a file, one of them must be updated, its value must change size and the attribute should not the last one. >> Preferably on a temporary test pool - I don't want to risk your data. > > Ah, thanks for the heads up. I'll work something out and report > back. Yeah, better safe than sorry. -- Andriy Gapon