From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 4 20:54:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432C516A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:54:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0837743D31 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:54:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i64KsA98061362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:54:10 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i64Ks970061361 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:54:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:54:09 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040704205409.GA61158@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E86EBB@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> <40E59559.8090907@cronyx.ru> <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 04 Jul 2004 21:54:10 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040612, clamav-milter version 0.72a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat removed, linux to follow X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 20:54:16 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 09:23:09PM +0100, n0g0013 wrote: > what is the story with PGP signatures these days? last i > investigated there was a multi-part mime format that was meant > to be standard and nobody used (except mutt, which i use). >=20 > does anyone use that format or is it all inline now? mutt > won't recognise the inline format as signed (and consequently > won't verify the content). It's a case of duelling standards: RFC 2633 vs RFC 3156. You should be able to verify RFC 2633 messages using openssl's smime capability. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA6G5xiD657aJF7eIRAmKbAJ9jBkQE/5zdY0kO2t4W2IjBKEbsoQCfQWh/ ooVoWPTNP1CdKz86NqoRTSw= =9Tx5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--