From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 14:10:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F01F106564A for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:10:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mh@kernel32.de) Received: from crivens.kernel32.de (crivens.asm68k.org [81.169.171.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CE98FC1D for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.terrorteam.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by crivens.kernel32.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99254B03B9; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:53:54 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:53:54 +0100 From: Marian Hettwer To: Andy Kosela In-Reply-To: References: <4C77A267.10102@thelostparadise.com> Message-ID: <5d88fc9506514cabc7390e66a1f9872f@localhost> X-Sender: mh@kernel32.de User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1-rc2 Cc: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Pieter de Boer Subject: Re: tcpdump -z X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:10:40 -0000 On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:02:43 +0200, Andy Kosela wrote: > > If you care about security I would definetly dump sudo(8) in the > first place... > Why is that? I'd like to hear some good reasons why one should not use sudo(8) if one's interested in security. Quite the opposite is true, imo. So... hej, do you have facts to backup that claim? I'd be really interested! ./Marian