From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Jun 10 9:43:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from durango.picus.com (durango.picus.com [209.100.20.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D25837BCAD for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 09:43:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from troy@picus.com) Received: from abyss [209.100.22.250] by durango.picus.com (SMTPD32-5.05) id AFC612E0136; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 12:41:42 -0400 From: "Troy Settle" To: "Love Bug" , Subject: RE: LAN detection? Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 12:43:36 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <39425883.512141CC@fil.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I know you probably have your reasons for wanting to do this, but I'm at a loss as to why you percieve it as an issue.. A user is connected to your PM2-30, the fastest they're connecting is 33.6Kb/s. What does it matter if they have 1 computer or 10 behind that connection? They can't exceed the 33.6 limit imposed by the connection. If you are worried about these users staying online too long, then impose time limits, not usage limits. Honestly, you'll just drive yourself insane if you try to track down and enforce the "single computer" rule. -- Troy Settle Network Analyst Picus Communications 540.633.6327 ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG ** [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Love Bug ** Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 11:02 AM ** To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG ** Subject: LAN detection? ** ** ** LAN detection? ** ** Our ISP has a service that is specified as being a "single ** computer". In ** other words, you should not be using NAT or distrabuting it ** over a LAN with ** things like winroute and D-Link 602's or WebRamps (or even ** FreeBDS and ** userland PPP!). Being a tiny ISP it is important to control ** bandwidth use ** and abuse. ** ** Customers dial into a PortMaster 2E-30, straight through a ** Dummynet, forced ** to a Squid Proxy (No direct port 80) and then through an ** IPFilter Firewall. ** The Dummynet, Squid, and IpFilter are all on different boxes ** connected to ** our LAN Hub. ** ** I am just looking for a way to trap one or two people who are sucking ** bandwidth across a LAN without paying their fair share of ** the costs. Any ** Ideas? Is it possible to see the MAC address of the orignal ** LAN card? ** ** Thank You, ** ** Love ** ** ** ** ** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org ** with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message ** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message