From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Jul 31 12:22:13 1996
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA17955
          for security-outgoing; Wed, 31 Jul 1996 12:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.177])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA17944;
          Wed, 31 Jul 1996 12:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA02487; Tue, 30 Jul 1996 21:06:55 +0200 (MET DST)
To: Luc Chamberland <lchamber@ec.camitel.com>
cc: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@tombstone.sunrem.com>,
        Nathan Lawson <nlawson@kdat.csc.calpoly.edu>,
        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Crack 4.1 patches for FBSD 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 30 Jul 1996 08:19:46 -0000."
             <XFMail.960730082239.lchamber@ec.camitel.com> 
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 21:06:54 +0200
Message-ID: <2485.838753614@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <XFMail.960730082239.lchamber@ec.camitel.com>, Luc Chamberland write
s:
>
>On 30-Jul-96 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>>>  ...Something likes PGP? What are you thinking about that?
>>
>>yes, "something like that".  Remember that it doesn't have to be a
>>two way algorithm, so we can be more creative than PGP.
>>
>>--
>
>   and PGP is less powerfull in this way?

PGP is a rather large piece of code, and certain restrictions apply
to the modification of it.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.