From nobody Tue Jun 30 20:02:27 2026 X-Original-To: java@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4gqYw54DbPz6jrD9 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "YR1" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4gqYw372Q4z4H34 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1782849748; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0JVgbixTULhJq5yIyXdP3imCQ1QacBRp+26Am3mZhL4=; b=kFtI93wRHMGm7yxf80/UWiyzv+L7aILV4unXiGkMU54BX5lGFphMk5AxtYxSV6iPCRLZqm R6zMLe1/U6L6Bk26byRbokYLm1q27UU6wqgT2dMGBMJqAKEEKHIOJRshLDyG0Vfdd4hGag 9kV+Fi0NaAlKbV3A1VNpnn5P3+prZJMIT1pGudEOWtdOMN4K3EkLeP2IqQ9WbGM+/15Ki+ KyJU/WTMEDW5xDnQZlbxrBBE9AFzu9RJ0Aff2xYQC1PYCd7iPkcuouZtCs5FQVnpd9/azR A7BrteItkBL4xuxcMP2ZRpK/RzqpS8nKEa1fs+6J1Zl40/7yi2McsYs9uMfmQw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1782849748; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Ukm2ITTwwrlQj6YWrjG/omdh1tSCkZIL80qF5rNKruOzx1ghalZHV8YH2d/v8yz+b7Bcbj Os6lGtD7YN8a6A+9BuYFxTo3BmtRTgi/jePHYeZJUr+YnkyuMf/rFB3pjArNxI4h0QNaTu 84urR/MrqO0CBY0UhLnw8KzrMe3ZktGvpBCJ40NVfkS69qhuE//kHaKfvA5aF/rZZzrDlp 6N8fubGbIHr1NXUEtHEUucZlki8+4aJHHfkFekhMIGls6MMG8o762+ezU85bIz1CbrfUVh iUGYgd7skWI404OQ8AE+Fg2rL8xQXQjuQc81aTUSoap++dW4t3ymq/MSj/YEeQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1782849748; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0JVgbixTULhJq5yIyXdP3imCQ1QacBRp+26Am3mZhL4=; b=teVsQwIRHeV9R5uFOjJGlRooA6+ICaH/4fKPL6ThBn3neTCtqt7dLJGNvk78YXeJvSsfXg dhhbVaOk0mrjao4MANymItR9GFhRvbNU4z8I4tjNr9GpZXQSKL58zRM6Vk3IXg1hsk1hTw DEVs3Rl9cg4u+AhXnKzIXMY0V9rkuy2MMN3Cr8yOARZEvxA58zhNd627Eq9O6CvruCfvHv TF7TndWCvDY+Aw7wqMHM2djo3d217duNBVGzZY8rwCFH744mfb43Fj9B2EUsjqxUt0vJlK 89ApVF7YmQWFjBqvgUkLojMIZgjJxI0hHiCUpq/DRQM7IbIbMQnWk1VPKPTI0w== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4gqYw35x07zyVv for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 65UK2Rt0059282 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 65UK2RTq059281 for java@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 296414] java/openjdk25: flavor headless doesn't get used Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bob@vesterman.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: java@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-java List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D296414 Bug ID: 296414 Summary: java/openjdk25: flavor headless doesn't get used Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: java@FreeBSD.org Reporter: bob@vesterman.com Flags: maintainer-feedback?(java@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: java@FreeBSD.org I apologize if I'm misunderstanding something here, but: I just noticed in the 2025 fourth quarter status report -- I'm slow :) -- t= hat there's a new "headless" option for openjdk25. I built it, uninstalled openjdk25@jdk along with the things that use it, and installed openjdk25@headless. All went fine to here. But then I tried to reinstall the first of the things that I was using the = JDK for (devel/nexus2-oss, though I'm not sure that it matters all that specifically to the problem I'm posting about), and was surprised to see pkg say that it was going to install openjdk25. Like I said, I had already installed openjdk25@headless. I then noticed that the names of the things produced by the two flavors are different: "openjdk25-25.0.3+9.f.1" vs. "openjdk25-headless-25.0.3+9.f.1". = I'm ignorantly guessing this might have something to do with it? Like, maybe devel/nexus2-oss is looking specifically for the former, and doesn't care a= bout the latter? I hadn't noticed anything saying that something special had to be done to actually use the new flavor, so I had just assumed it was a drop-in replace= ment (at least, on a headless machine). In addition to the fourth quarter status report itself, I had also checked for that sort of thing in /usr/ports/UPDA= TING and in the release messages on FreshPorts. Is there something else that needs to be done? Thanks in advance. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=