From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 11 14:29:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E321065706; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Received: from mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448BC8FC17; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:29:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkQFADRJT1BbsVPi/2dsb2JhbABFhUC2D4EIgiABAQVWIgEQCw4KCRYPCQMCAQIBJx4GDQEHAQGIEAe7e4sQhiYDjmWBIJV1gmg Received: from 226.83-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.83.226]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2012 16:28:01 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8BES0w1003115; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:28:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Message-ID: <504F4A6B.4010001@coosemans.org> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:27:55 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120804 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dimitry Andric References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911132410.GA87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <504F4645.4070900@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <504F4645.4070900@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBFD8D9E5ECC97448A85D6470" Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, Steve Kargl Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:29:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBFD8D9E5ECC97448A85D6470 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11-09-2012 16:10, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-09-11 15:24, Steve Kargl wrote: >> What is important is whether software built with clang functions >> correctly. See for example, >> >> http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/errata.html#WhatComp >=20 > Yes, maths support, specifically precision, is admittedly still one of > clang's (really llvm's) weaker points. It is currently not really a > high priority item for upstream. >=20 > This is obviously something that a certain part of our userbase will > care a lot about, while most of the time they won't care so much about > licensing or politics. So those people are probably better off using > gcc for the time being. Does it affect the accuracy of libm functions? --------------enigBFD8D9E5ECC97448A85D6470 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iF4EAREIAAYFAlBPSnAACgkQfoCS2CCgtivMWQD/VQ92Zv0/xh1leFgSZlnBjQQY 72yUvBStfMih/BvtiQoA/jiyDeQ0pJJFfc63eOjeVVstprPzYaX0V6XBOLdNDQTr =JkS9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBFD8D9E5ECC97448A85D6470--