From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 23 15:13:09 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976A01065676
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:13:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBB768FC0A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:13:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2011 15:13:07 -0000
Received: from f055109075.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO mandree.no-ip.org)
	[78.55.109.75]
	by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 23 Mar 2011 16:13:07 +0100
X-Authenticated: #428038
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19hP/dV/kNhMwPFR7UD2kNY6HQXhlpw7Hwbh8FSbS
	LLJakDKBToTl26
Received: from apollo.emma.line.org (apollo.emma.line.org [192.168.0.4])
	by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC64945E1;
	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:13:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:::1])
	by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C6225AD87;
	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:13:05 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4D8A0E01.8090605@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:13:05 +0100
From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Shuvaev <shuvaev@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
References: <AANLkTintkKzW=o+7Q53aMSpA1mmqC7aDF1wN8zHY_Wc+@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110323091356.GA9549@lexx.ifp.tuwien.ac.at>
	<4D89F7CC.1020405@gmx.de>
	<20110323150639.GA14558@lexx.ifp.tuwien.ac.at>
In-Reply-To: <20110323150639.GA14558@lexx.ifp.tuwien.ac.at>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [GSoC] About the idea: Unicode support in vi
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:13:09 -0000

Am 23.03.2011 16:06, schrieb Alexey Shuvaev:

> Yes, nvi-devel is not developed any more, but I was saying that nvi
> in base is even older than nvi-devel, and it is worth looking at
> it. At least for the iconv support. As for the BDB, maybe strip it just
> out, if possible?

I don't believe it's possible, because it uses a RECNO database that is
backed by a text file, i. e. it crucially relies on it for data
management apparently.

But at least db51 and db42 work fine, apparently it was a db41-specific
incompatibility that broke nvi-devel 1.81.6_4.  Compiling
WITH_BDB_HIGHEST=yes should help for the nonce.  We're fixing the port
to use 4.2 at least.