From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 2 21:23:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B493E1065672 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 21:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jasone@canonware.com) Received: from canonware.com (10140.x.rootbsd.net [204.109.63.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909898FC17 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 21:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.168.4] (70-91-206-178-BusName-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.91.206.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by canonware.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0EC628417; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Jason Evans In-Reply-To: <4F7A170E.8020209@bluezbox.com> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:23:13 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <2FF97057-905D-4F02-9138-75680ABC6202@canonware.com> <4F79F020.9070504@freebsd.org> <3C11DB18-1C43-446E-A0BC-FC15C6126819@canonware.com> <4F7A170E.8020209@bluezbox.com> To: Oleksandr Tymoshenko X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TLS on ARM and MIPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:23:14 -0000 On Apr 2, 2012, at 2:15 PM, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote: > On 02/04/2012 1:31 PM, Jason Evans wrote: >>=20 >> Can we remove the NO_TLS definitions in src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c? = I can't test the result, of course=85 >=20 > How do I test it? Will running buildword on MIPS device with > these changes be sufficient? Or do we have specific tests for it? I typically two two rounds of buildworld/installworld/reboot to make = sure that the newly installed toolchain still works. This paranoia is = mainly to catch problems with static binaries, which won't change in = this case, so one round is probably enough. Jason=