From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Sep 10 1:12:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net (blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD1237B422; Sun, 10 Sep 2000 01:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca5-129.ix.netcom.com [209.109.234.129]) by blount.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA09329; Sun, 10 Sep 2000 04:12:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e8A8CA818571; Sun, 10 Sep 2000 01:12:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami) To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Extending bsd.port.mk diagnostics when some of the patches failto apply [patch for review] References: <39BA03B9.E3C051C5@FreeBSD.org> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 10 Sep 2000 01:12:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: Maxim Sobolev's message of "Sat, 09 Sep 2000 12:32:41 +0300" Message-ID: Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Satosi, Maxm, * Please tell your final word! ;) Oops sorry, I haven't replied to this? Yes, I think it's fine, it's in my bsd.port.mk and I've been using it for a couple of days. It will go in with the next batch. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message