Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:53:55 -0400 From: "Thomas Mullins" <tsmullins@wise.k12.va.us> To: "Grant Peel" <gpeel@thenetnow.com>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Anti Spam Message-ID: <537CB068C0C3DB4C857BB2719A89DC910108430B@mail2.wise.k12> References: <002001c7836b$06534bd0$6501a8c0@GRANT>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
A neighboring school system is using the Barracuda and really like it. Can't comment on the Easyantispam. But, why not just implement your own SA solution? That is what we do. I would be glad to explain our setup. Shane -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Grant Peel Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 11:43 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Anti Spam Hi all, I am posting this question here because I know there are alot of ISPs using FreeBSD (including me) and am hoping to get feedback, either directly to me or to the list. We are wrestling (as I am sure many are), with spam. Up until now we have been employing Spamassassin locally and using some 3rd party Anti-Spam servervices that are getting less and less reliable as the weeks go by. We are considering two hardware solutions, Easyantispam and Barracuda. Barracuda is very expensive, so the most likely candidate is Easyantispam. Does anyone out there have thought on either or both of these? Usability? Reliability? Total Cost of ownership? Integration issues? Any thoughts will be appreciated, -Grant _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?537CB068C0C3DB4C857BB2719A89DC910108430B>