From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 3 02:36:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA19144 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:36:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc8.ihf.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.90.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA19134; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 02:36:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tg@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de) Received: from ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.90.6]) by ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.7/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA01559; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 11:36:45 +0100 (CET) Received: (from tg@localhost) by ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.8/8.8.5) id LAA20749; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 11:36:40 +0100 (CET) To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/xlockmore Makefile ports/x11/xlockmore/files md5 References: <199803031026.CAA12102@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> From: Thomas Gellekum Date: 03 Mar 1998 11:36:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG's message of Tue, 03 Mar 1998 02:26:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8790qsnjrp.fsf@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.16 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) writes: > * Upgrade to 4.08. Use MesaGL when available. > > I see that you made this package-safe: > > but this also means the xlockmore package may or may not require > MesaGL depending on the state of my machine. > > Is that really ok? (If you want to force it one way or the other, you > can test on PACKAGE_BUILDING.) I was only thinking of people who build everything from the source. I'll add a check for PACKAGE_BUILDING. tg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message