From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 23 15:40:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31B8CACB for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 15:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F8CC2968 for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 15:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s4NFe02G096322 for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 15:40:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s4NFe0ZO096321; Fri, 23 May 2014 15:40:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 15:40:00 GMT Message-Id: <201405231540.s4NFe0ZO096321@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Allan Jude Subject: Re: docs/188214: Manpage for fsck(8) doesn't say what happens when no -t or -T Reply-To: Allan Jude X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 15:40:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/188214; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Allan Jude To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, rfg@tristatelogic.com, Tom Rhodes Cc: Subject: Re: docs/188214: Manpage for fsck(8) doesn't say what happens when no -t or -T Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 11:39:24 -0400 I have not checked the code to be sure, but from general usage I have noticed that fsck(8) doesn't actually try to detect, or 'taste' the partition, but only looks at /etc/fstab and if the type is not specified, then returns the error. Suggesting that it 'attempts to detect' may give the wrong impression. Someone would have to look at the source of fsck(8) to be sure. -- Allan Jude