From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 17 19:19:44 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E2516A403
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 May 2007 19:19:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net)
Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8797013C448
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 May 2007 19:19:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net)
Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l4HIklc5044401;
	Thu, 17 May 2007 14:46:48 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net)
From: John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:46:33 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <464B114C.5080703@net4.in> <44irarz7fs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
	<Pine.SOC.4.64.0705171135570.25365@libra.sfsu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0705171135570.25365@libra.sfsu.edu>
X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB;
	tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200705171446.33965.lists@jnielsen.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4,
	clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: KAYVEN RIESE <kayve@sfsu.edu>
Subject: Re: xfce4 broke after pkgdb -Ff
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:19:44 -0000

On Thursday 17 May 2007 02:37:15 pm KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > Please don't top-post.
> >
> > KAYVEN  RIESE <kayve@sfsu.edu> writes:
> >> so the "-r" option will be the significant difference for the
> >> portupgrade comamnd, just verifying
> >
> > Yes.  Otherwise, you may end up with some of the ports that depend on
> > pango being unable to use the new version.
> >
> > Make sure you look through the UPDATING file to see if there are any
> > other issues you need to take special action for at the same time.
>
> this guy seems to disagree
>
> jnielsendotnet:Try what I asked in my first reply (deleting and
> reinstalling pango manually), and see if you can get any error messages
> from xfce.
>
> If portupgrade -f is failing portupgrade -fr isn't likely to succeed
> either.

Portupgrade with the -r option is very useful, and you will probably want to 
use it. My point was that _before_ you try that you should figure out why 
portupgrade is failing to upgrade pango, and/or upgrade it manually. 
Otherwise it will just keep failing.

JN