From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Feb 27 13:19:14 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id NAA06198 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 13:19:14 -0800
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA06191; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 13:19:10 -0800
Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id NAA26885; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 13:18:12 -0800
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199502272118.NAA26885@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD
To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 1995 13:18:11 -0800 (PST)
Cc: nate@trout.sri.MT.net, jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <9502272059.AA03315@cs.weber.edu> from "Terry Lambert" at Feb 27, 95 01:59:54 pm
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 248       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Would CTM'ing the library portion of the NetBSD tree be satisfactory?

What would you expect this to do ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk>
TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
I am Pentium Of Borg. Division is Futile. You WILL be approximated.