From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 31 23:26:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from starfruit.itojun.org (ny-ppp001.iij-us.net [216.98.99.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39A437B698 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 23:26:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starfruit.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26147E56; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:11:01 +0900 (JST) To: Yu-Shun Wang Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-reply-to: yushunwa's message of Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:00:58 PST. X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: IPComp question From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 14:11:01 +0900 Message-Id: <20010201051101.F26147E56@starfruit.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > No, but the problem is that there was no increase (actually, no > record at all) under ipsec: IPComp. The number on the sending > side seemed right. The increase matched the ones I saw from > tcpdump. It looked like the IPComp packets either weren't > logged or were dropped for some reason. send the following items. - full tcpdump output - netstat -sn before, and after the test (on both ends) - full SA configuration on both sides (previous email may have included it) - ifconfig -a output, on both ends - netstat -rn output, on both ends - simple network diagram (like intermediate routers) between both ends itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message