Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:42:41 +0300
From:      Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>
To:        freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: E4500 spend one core to saturate 1Gbit/s link with TCP -- is it nornal?
Message-ID:  <1715104467.20101220234241@serebryakov.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <12810339411.20101220205327@serebryakov.spb.ru>
References:  <12810339411.20101220205327@serebryakov.spb.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Freebsd-net.
You wrote 20 =E4=E5=EA=E0=E1=F0=FF 2010 =E3., 20:53:27:

>  I have file server with Core2Duo E4500 CPU and Intel gigabit adapter
>  (82566DM).

>  FreeBSD 8-STABLE (8.2-PRERELEASE #1: Fri Dec 3 2010) and
> samba35-3.5.6 are installed.

>  This server could serve about 110MiB/s to one client over CIFS, but
> one core of CPU is completely busy in such situation: about 60% of CPU
> is occuped by "ketnel" and 35-40% occuped bu "smbd" accroding to "top
> -S" ouput.

>  Is it normal, that 2.2GHz core is needed to saturate 1Gib link with
>  only one client (and one TCP connction), or I have something
>  misconfigured?
 Ok, pressing "H" in "top" shows, that all this CPU goes to "{em0
 tasq}" thread.

  And, yes, I have all rxd/trd and other tunables set to recommended
high values.



--=20
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1715104467.20101220234241>