Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:03:44 +0100 From: Martin McCann <martinmcc@orbweavers.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anthony's drive issues.Re: ssh password delay Message-ID: <1112144624.661.38.camel@orker.orbweavers.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <785092730.20050329231636@wanadoo.fr> References: <42480F8B.1060405@makeworld.com> <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNEEPAFAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <42496060.1060404@makeworld.com><42496992.7020800@makeworld.com> <42498D19.60209@makeworld.com> <813611053.20050329205032@wanadoo.fr> <f437208e618414fda808bef45da84392@chrononomicon.com> <785092730.20050329231636@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> No, I was referring to the additional modularity and stability made > possible by the additional abstraction of a HAL. > Please explain this to me - I have had a lot of experience in OS design, and would like you, who obviously from you remarks, have extensive OS design knowledge, point out to me how a HAL makes an OS inherintly more stable than a system that writes its drivers for a particular peice of hardware, without pretence it will cope with differetn pieces of hardware?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1112144624.661.38.camel>