From owner-freebsd-multimedia Tue Dec 19 1:10: 6 2000 From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 19 01:10:02 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.alcove.fr (smtp.alcove.fr [212.155.209.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F019C37B400; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 01:10:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from wiliam.alcove-int ([10.16.110.19]) by smtp.alcove.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 148ImW-0002NK-00; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:10:00 +0100 Received: from nsouch by wiliam.alcove-int with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 148ImV-0002w9-00; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:09:59 +0100 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 10:09:59 +0100 From: Nicolas Souchu To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Various VGA, VGL, FB questions Message-ID: <20001219100959.A11249@wiliam.alcove-int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i Organization: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Alc=F4ve=2C_http:=2F=2Fwww=2Ealcove=2Efr?= Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear hackers, Why is there the same VGA code in dev/fb/vga.c and libvgl? I think especially of the set_palette routines. As a more general rule, what's the philosophy for the future of libvgl and framebuffer? Should VGL drawing routines be moved to dev/fb/vga.c? Also, there are some drawing routines enclosed with notyet defines. What are there state? bogus? Finally, is someone working on this part of the tree currently? Nicholas -- Nicolas.Souchu@alcove.fr Alcôve - Open Source Software Engineer - http://www.alcove.fr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message