Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 01:37:16 GMT From: NAKATA@FreeBSD.org, Maho <maho@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/101620: repocopy request /usr/ports/lang/gcc41-withgcjawt -> /usr/ports/lang/gcc42-withgcjawt Message-ID: <200608080137.k781bGs3025145@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200608080140.k781eG4k005697@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 101620 >Category: ports >Synopsis: repocopy request /usr/ports/lang/gcc41-withgcjawt -> /usr/ports/lang/gcc42-withgcjawt >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Aug 08 01:40:16 GMT 2006 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: NAKATA, Maho >Release: 6.1-RELEASE >Organization: FreeBSD.org >Environment: FreeBSD satie.private.org 6.1-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p3 #1: Thu Jul 13 15:40:08 JST 2006 maho@satie.private.org:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MAHO i386 >Description: I made several ports for free Java alternative (gcc41-withgcjawt, ecj-bootstrap, gjdoc, java-gcj-compat) and they depend on the gcc41. However, gcc42 includes much more better Java support than gcc41, even though gcc42 is a development state. IMHO gcc41-withgcjawt have some commit logs, and gcc42-withgcjawt should share it. this is the reason for requesting the repocopy operation. >How-To-Repeat: N/A >Fix: repocopy, please >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200608080137.k781bGs3025145>