From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 19 05:11:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2617E16A4CE for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 05:11:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.fujixerox.co.jp (mx2.fujixerox.co.jp [192.26.96.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4A143D1F for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 05:11:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from isvw2.fujixerox.co.jp ([129.249.27.132]) by mx2.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j4J5BFm20021; Thu, 19 May 2005 14:11:16 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (isvw2 [129.249.27.132]) by isvw2.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j4J5B7s27706; Thu, 19 May 2005 14:11:07 +0900 (JST) Received: from sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com ([13.198.8.73]) by ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j4J5BDa07155; Thu, 19 May 2005 14:11:13 +0900 (JST) Received: from 10.198.8.10 by sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com with ESMTP id 50835231116479455; Thu, 19 May 2005 13:10:55 +0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A033F1D92E; Thu, 19 May 2005 13:04:17 +0800 (SGT) Received: from sess.xssc.sgp.xerox.com (unknown [13.198.33.122]) by imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD441D92E; Thu, 19 May 2005 13:04:16 +0800 (SGT) From: Xu Qiang To: Giorgos Keramidas , Dan Nelson Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 13:13:43 +0800 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 60130 (9.0.2711) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20050519050416.5BD441D92E@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> cc: Xu Qiang cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: RE: The availability of socketbits.h? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 05:11:28 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > One patch file for the entire source tree of each package would be > even better, but anyway... Yes, but to this software, there are two kind of patches (of you, and Dan N= elson, respectively) that both works independently, so... :) = > The manpage of gcc is severely out of date. The GNU folks prefer > Texinfo for their documentation since a long time ago. Just ignore > the manpage of gcc(1). IMHO, it provides absolutely no useful > information anymore :-( So, would you point me to the place of GCC usage of the option -std? Even g= oogle failed to find it. :( > My "patch" is incorrect. Use Dan's changes :-) Dan's sure is correct. But your fix also works well, after I changed the co= mmand.c file. It would not work if we only patch the command_list.h hearder= . = > An example could be: > = > # cd /tmp/nngs/directory/of/file/ > # patch -p0 < /tmp/dan_nelson.diff Thanks for this detailed explanation and example, hoho, the example is bett= er for such a lazy bone as I. :) A side note: = After the server is running, I used Jago (http://www.rene-grothmann.de/jago= /) as a client tool to connect to the server. The experiment shows that the= server-client interaction works fine. Strongly recommend this go client so= ftware by Rene Grothmann, which is also an open-source software (But not GN= U). Regards, Xu Qiang