Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:39:13 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: threads stress test Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10403020034490.9823-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <40441A7E.7000805@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Peter Grehan wrote: > I've been using the ping-pong test program described in: > > http://wwws.sun.com/software/whitepapers/solaris9/multithread.pdf > > to test out Suleiman Souhal's PPC libthr patches. FYI, you can also build libpthread in 1:1 mode and won't need a fully working set of user context switch functions. Both alpha and sparc64 seem to limp by with 1:1 libpthread. > I just took out sledge (AMD64) with this when linking against > libpthread and running with '-v -i 10000'. Not sure if it happens > on i386, but maybe KSE developers might want to give it a try. > Source is at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/~grehan/pp.c > > WRT libthr, ctl-C from the shell doesn't seem to get through when > running this program (verified on panther/sparc64), although libpthread > does the right thing. > > Oops, just took out panther when running with libthr after doing > some libpthread testing. Definitely worth a try ! I can also take out panther running a very simple libpthread (in 1:1 mode) test (libpthread/test/sigwait_d.c). -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10403020034490.9823-100000>