From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Oct 1 15:34:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from c956029-a.haywd2.sfba.home.com (c956029-a.haywd2.sfba.home.com [24.0.78.216]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FEF14C58 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 15:34:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from schluntz@timberwolf.workofstone.net) Received: from timberwolf (timberwolf.workofstone.net [10.0.0.9]) by c956029-a.haywd2.sfba.home.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA07439; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 16:05:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from schluntz@timberwolf.workofstone.net) Message-Id: <199910012305.QAA07439@c956029-a.haywd2.sfba.home.com> To: elazich@AlaskaAir.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routing Question. Reply-To: "Sean J. Schluntz" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 Oct 1999 15:25:05 PDT." Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 15:33:52 -0700 From: schluntz@timberwolf.workofstone.net Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , elazich@AlaskaAir. com writes: >you should be able to do this by including the interface via which >traffic will be directed for the internal net. the rule might look >like; > >ipfw add pass all from 10.0.0.0/8 to any via [interface name] I thought that, but then where does it get the info for where the gateway for that interface is? My default route points to a third interface (not the private subnet or the NAT outside interface) If it just pushes packets out that interface with no gateway (or the other gateway) attached to them won't they just get lost? -Sean To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message