Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:01:59 +0000 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r407270 - head/ports-mgmt/portmaster Message-ID: <20160127080158.GR87372@droso.dk> In-Reply-To: <56A80CFF.7070900@FreeBSD.org> References: <201601261123.u0QBNcvL091258@repo.freebsd.org> <56A80CFF.7070900@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:19:11PM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 1/26/2016 3:23 AM, John Marino wrote: > > Author: marino > > Date: Tue Jan 26 11:23:38 2016 > > New Revision: 407270 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/407270 > >=20 > > Log: > > ports-mgmt/portmaster: DEPRECATE without expiration date > > =20 > I think this needs community discussion. Many people have said privately > it bothered them. >=20 Please revert. As you point out, there are good reasons for doing so, but the subsequent discussion also makes clear there are plenty of reasons not to do so. This needs a wider discussion and not a unilateral drive-by commit. Erwin --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEVAwUBVqh5dlF75hSlwe7HAQrzDwf/QfCKfErsJbk67f0zvUmpPF4rjRzrQMtb 66QEee0+jnbOAR5G9DdR17iiK+M3A/2Lw8BttxijkIzhvYEu0O49T73LSHuUMp2o 4aPvmb7tlU8/k+90Vr/EIYkLpOUNNW6eIt73fyCw7ORqmgm8ax1Jwq+apvtbDP8H du+vfhYAF2htTPwWbXeisVo491QxYcRxUXnRa0rIU8lClp4Vk5iJN1E4ExNXFVJk Db26ECXfrji3xtZUiP3QJ59qJZ9HfofBb/xGLrHvKZGNmU9IT3lXk/KspcvuCQZw cbXXIK58BXhSfVeSAYulbhpxPjIHcEWmuV+Q7ReQ1UYthsPm+3PIGg== =24Fq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160127080158.GR87372>