From owner-freebsd-security  Fri Apr 17 10:05:20 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA01922
          for freebsd-security-outgoing; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 10:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA01911
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:05:10 GMT
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA12448;
	Fri, 17 Apr 1998 10:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
cc: Johan Allard <allard@NetMan.SE>,
        Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org>,
        Dima Ruban <dima@best.net>, Matthew Hunt <mph@pobox.com>,
        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: kernel permissions 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 17 Apr 1998 12:15:57 EDT."
             <199804171615.MAA11623@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 10:04:07 -0700
Message-ID: <12444.892832647@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> If we could just get the WIDE people and the INRIA people (and the NRL
> people) to all coalesce around a single solution, we'd have a clear
> winner.

Of course, the odds of that ever happening are probably equivalent to
that of the moon suddenly flying out of its orbit, so what would you
propose instead?  We just can't keep sitting on the fence and doing
nothing about this forever, can we?

					Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message