Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 May 2015 20:27:34 +0300
From:      Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Chagin Dmitry <dchagin@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r283424 - in head/sys: amd64/linux modules/linux64
Message-ID:  <20150525172734.GR21070@zxy.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <1834151.lrAIDRMoJM@ralph.baldwin.cx>
References:  <201505241607.t4OG7C7b073936@svn.freebsd.org> <3590632.VFQBH2fsZP@ralph.baldwin.cx> <20150525151339.GM1394@zxy.spb.ru> <1834151.lrAIDRMoJM@ralph.baldwin.cx>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:32:41PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:

> On Monday, May 25, 2015 06:13:39 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:40:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > 
> > > Some other related questions are: can we revive print/acroread now and or
> > > use a 64-bit flash plugin after these changes?
> > 
> > I am still use print/acroread.
> > As I know removing print/acroread irrelevant to linuxator.
> > This is will by security reasson.
> > I am don't open suspicious pdf from suspicious source and just ignore
> > this removing.
> 
> I mean more if these updates allow us to update to a newer version of
> print/acroread that would no longer be vulnerable (if such a thing exists)
> whether 32- or 64-bit.

Currenly I don't see any linux in Acrobat Reader support OS: https://get.adobe.com/reader/otherversions/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150525172734.GR21070>