From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 09:55:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C395E16A4CE; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 09:55:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lovett.com (core.lovett.com [216.168.8.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C3143D5F; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 09:55:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ade@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ts46-02-qdr1249.mdfrd.or.charter.com ([66.169.242.225] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by mail.lovett.com with asmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1ApABT-000MYa-6T; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:54:31 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1075871381.76993.21.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1075892773.694.38.camel@gorf.lovett.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: <8317FE94-58CD-11D8-891D-000A956B6386@FreeBSD.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Ade Lovett Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 09:54:29 -0800 To: des@des.no (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612) cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Joe Marcus Clarke Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Latest round of bsd.*.mk changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:55:22 -0000 On Feb 04, 2004, at 16:06, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Nothing has really changed. With port.mkversion, we didn't support > systems installed prior to the date 4.3 was released (regardless of > what version they actually were). Now we just don't support anything > older than 4.3 (regardless of when it was installed). Ok. The point being that we have a reasonable amount of code in the=20 tree that works around features not present in earlier releases than=20 4.3. A lot of this code could now be ripped out, seeing as >=3D 4.3 is now=20 required, and I'd suggest a specific OSVERSION check as early as=20 possible to stave off the "I'm on <4.3, why did this port fail=20 mysteriously" questions. -aDe