From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 26 12:42:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA04647 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 26 May 1998 12:42:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA04635 for ; Tue, 26 May 1998 12:42:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA00466; Tue, 26 May 1998 11:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199805261836.LAA00466@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Eivind Eklund cc: "John S. Dyson" , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fix for undefined "__error" and discussion of shared object versioning In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 26 May 1998 19:43:34 +0200." <19980526194334.44185@follo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 11:36:54 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Tue, May 26, 1998 at 11:59:52AM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote: > > I really don't think that we would want to also get into compiler > > support issues. Tool support issues are complex enough. I can imagine > > that egcs (could) be stable enough for our c++ compiler, but am much > > less confident of it being our default c compiler. > > Personally I'd prefer to use TenDRA if at all possible. It seems to > be much better than GCC when you look at error control etc. How much of the world will build with it? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message