From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 12 10:02:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EBEB16A41B; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788DF13C4DD; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:02:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D4320B9; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:02:42 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.2/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C327120B1; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:02:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B013D8449F; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:02:42 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Sam Leffler References: <86ir2hznnd.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86abnpu0wv.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86abnovy4k.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86odc3dlgi.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86lk76c6t5.fsf@ds4.des.no> <864pds8idc.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4787B540.2040003@errno.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:02:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4787B540.2040003@errno.com> (Sam Leffler's message of "Fri\, 11 Jan 2008 10\:28\:16 -0800") Message-ID: <867iif7459.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Sepherosa Ziehau , kevlo@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_ral regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:02:53 -0000 Sam Leffler writes: > FWIW I took ownership of a ral bug where AP mode tx just stopped for > no apparent reason (I think it was probe response frames but can't > recall). This sounds like the same thing; can you check kern/117655? Looks similar, except for the part about the PCI version - my AP is a soekris net4801 which I suspect supports only good old 1.1. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no