From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Apr 22 09:10:12 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDCED4AC72 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 09:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c17:6c4b::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D4EB182B for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 09:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from hps2016.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.129.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73C6F1FE022; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:10:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Switching branches of freebsd-base-graphics with git To: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org References: <8d4600d1-8676-1284-3350-ebcba954efb6@selasky.org> From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <638244e8-80d0-164c-1120-bc3278384af8@selasky.org> Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:08:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 09:10:12 -0000 On 04/22/17 10:45, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> Hi Eric, > >> drm-next is close to becoming a port for -current. > >> You still need to build drm-next for it to work. > >> -HPS > > Does this mean using drm-next branch of freebsd-base-graphics src tree instead of regular src tree? Yes, this is correct. > > Or is drm-next a port, in the ports tree? No, not yet. > > In that case, which version of ports tree should be used, regular or freebsd-ports-graphics? > > I notice the GENERIC kernel config files have no line showing the date, making it difficult to keep up my custom kernel config and GENERIB. > > GENERIB differs from GENERIC by removing drivers for outdated hardware unlikely to be found, such as SCSI cards and ISA Ethernet, but with added support for some wireless, expecially rsu, not present in GENERIC. > OK. --HPS