From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 19 00:30:27 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D6EECD;
 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:30:27 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8871E58;
 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:30:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
 id 97A445607D; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:30:21 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:30:21 -0500
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: gccmakedep fix - 20130619
Message-ID: <20130619003021.GA18324@lonesome.com>
References: <CAPjTQNF9wW2=xwzMiWMFrodW6P37y58mZ6M7qM-ZiNKzykDNFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <51C0EA9C.5090502@marino.st>
 <CAPjTQNEEX187_tmqM5vSWBS4WM1ihXcBL=P5MuG76GDwD8DU2A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPjTQNEEX187_tmqM5vSWBS4WM1ihXcBL=P5MuG76GDwD8DU2A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, John Marino <dragonflybsd@marino.st>,
 current@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:30:27 -0000

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:51:42AM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> > 3) Is not it better to submit via PR (GNATS) rather than a mailing list?
> >   That's what PRs are for...
> 
> Mail are faster than PR-s.

If we all go down that route, it means less and less people will try
to read all the traffic on ports@.  Please, use the PR database for
what's it's intended for.  Thanks.

mcl