From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Mon Dec 10 17:59:04 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44EF132E847
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:59:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it
 [2.44.121.52])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89AFE859CA
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:59:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wBAHwrhL099500
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO);
 Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:59:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it
 [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu
Subject: Re: frebsd jails advice
To: Ken M <ken@mack-z.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <556380033.2269176.1544437025342.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
 <556380033.2269176.1544437025342@mail.yahoo.com>
 <20181210115829.GA35331@vps.markoturk.info>
 <fd0f9d99-baab-f4f5-74c3-757ae314358f@netfence.it>
 <20181210171629.GA66232@ultron>
From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
Message-ID: <fc9ee1f3-dafb-0c96-4c4d-f6f02a0d3658@netfence.it>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:58:53 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181210171629.GA66232@ultron>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 89AFE859CA
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.82 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.45)[-0.450,0];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.89)[-0.887,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[];
 MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx.netfence.it];
 RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.39)[-0.390,0];
 R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
 IP_SCORE(0.02)[country: IT(0.09)];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:59:04 -0000

On 12/10/18 6:16 PM, Ken M wrote:
> Depending on the ssh encryption format ssh -X can actually be slower than VNC.

I never experienced this.
(N.B. I'm not saying you are wrong, possibly it depends on use case).

In any case, I think the OP's talking about a LAN: in that case I don't 
think speed matters that much and SSH+X11 will give a much better 
experience than VNC or RDP (cfr. one program running remotely vs the 
whole desktop running remotely).