From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Dec 26 17:02:41 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA24638 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 26 Dec 1995 17:02:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA24621 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 1995 17:02:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id RAA08661; Tue, 26 Dec 1995 17:02:34 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.7.3/8.6.5) with SMTP id RAA06100; Tue, 26 Dec 1995 17:02:35 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199512270102.RAA06100@corbin.Root.COM> To: Andreas Klemm cc: Torbjorn Granlund , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pentium bcopy In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 26 Dec 95 09:13:03 +0100." From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 17:02:34 -0800 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >Will Torbjorn Granlund's bcopy and related assembler routines be used in >-current ? Is someone working on it ? I'm working on it. Whether or not the new bcopy makes it into -current is quite another thing, however, as it improves some things and slows down others. The new bzero for P5/P6 seems to be a win all the way around, so it will likely make it into the kernel. Anyway, I'm still working on it. -DG