From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 08:47:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0201816A4CF for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:47:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.star-sw.com (mail.star-sw.com [217.195.82.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF8643D48 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:47:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nkritsky@star-sw.com) Received: from ARGON.star-sw.com (argon.star-sw.com [217.195.82.10]) by mail.star-sw.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6U8lLls021020; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:47:21 +0400 (MSD) Received: from ibmka.star-sw.com ([192.168.32.130]) by ARGON.star-sw.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:47:21 +0400 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:47:20 +0400 From: "Nickolay A. Kritsky" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.49) Personal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <11319912718.20040730124720@star-sw.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" In-reply-To: References: <652582171.20040730075831@star-sw.com> <12410155296.20040730100443@star-sw.com> <11116772218.20040730115500@star-sw.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2004 08:47:21.0005 (UTC) FILETIME=[D39D75D0:01C47611] cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re[4]: ipsec packet filtering X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Nickolay A. Kritsky" List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:47:23 -0000 Hello Bjoern, Friday, July 30, 2004, 12:12:52 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> see? if the incoming packet is not in table, _and_ natd is not running >> in proxy_only mode (which is not acceptable here) the packet flows by >> without any change. And that's what the `man natd' says. BAZ> please type BAZ> man natd BAZ> /reverse BAZ> n BAZ> this should be available in 4.9 too. It's there. Oh my god! RTFM forever. Well, thanks a lot, and sorry for time/traffic consumption. I still don't like current situation with the way ipsec is processed by ipfw, but -reverse will help me for now. -- Best regards, ; Nickolay A. Kritsky ; SysAdmin STAR Software LLC ; mailto:nkritsky@star-sw.com