From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan  9 11:05:19 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 97EF516A4D1; Sun,  9 Jan 2005 11:05:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 4D1E843D2F; Sun,  9 Jan 2005 11:05:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa07874@salmon>; 9 Jan 2005 11:05:17 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:05:17 +0000
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20050109110517.GA45351@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <200501082256.j08Mu9XJ015280@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<41E0D155.9020704@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
	<20050109040059.6e14a902@mobile.pittgoth.com>
	<41E0F853.6060207@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
	<20050109042816.7e1c9ef1@mobile.pittgoth.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050109042816.7e1c9ef1@mobile.pittgoth.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ping6 Makefile ping6.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 11:05:19 -0000

On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 04:28:16AM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> Tis ok, should be fixed now.  You were right, I missed this
> because I didn't perform a 64-bit test.  Pass the pointy hat
> for me to bear for my mistake.  :)

With warns bumps you usually need to be careful to test on sparc/alpha
too, incase you expose warnings to do with increased alignment
requirements.

	David.