From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May  6 08:29:26 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F44137B401
	for <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  6 May 2003 08:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95A943F93
	for <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  6 May 2003 08:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nectar@celabo.org)
Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK))
	by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 305D5BB; Tue,  6 May 2003 10:29:25 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 92EB178C66; Tue,  6 May 2003 10:29:26 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 10:29:26 -0500
From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
To: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Message-ID: <20030506152926.GG77708@madman.celabo.org>
Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>,
	Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
References: <20030501182820.GA53641@madman.celabo.org>
	<XFMail.20030501144502.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
	<20030501191027.GA53801@madman.celabo.org>
	<20030505110601.H53365@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
	<20030505175426.GA19352@madman.celabo.org>
	<20030506093754.B838@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030506093754.B838@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i-ja.1
cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Re: `Hiding' libc symbols
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 15:29:26 -0000

On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 09:46:12AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> No. If I define my own printf() I want that printf to be called even by
> library internal calls. 

No, you really don't.  If you do, then you use the techniques that
dozens of applications already use today.  `Hiding' libc symbols do
not get in the way of these techniques.

printf is an incredibly bad example, of course.  What makes you think
there are any calls to printf in libc anyway?

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques Vidrine   . NTT/Verio SME      . FreeBSD UNIX       . Heimdal
nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se