From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 25 22:03:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1AB10656AC for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:03:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3DC8FC14 for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3PM2pbH004757; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:02:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n3PM2oab004754; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:02:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:02:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Maxim Khitrov In-Reply-To: <26ddd1750904251031q486a6ddar523d1470ce1fd8be@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <26ddd1750904251031q486a6ddar523d1470ce1fd8be@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: Software raid5 through a sata port multiplier X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:03:35 -0000 > thinking that a software raid5 solution may not be such a bad idea. software raid5 isn't any more bad than hardware raid5 most cases. just raid5 is bad if you use it in ANY type of load except: a) mostly reads - then set LARGE RAID stripe size b) mostly huge files - then set small RAID stripe size to have highest single thread transfer, or large to have higher concurency. EVERY OTHER case is bad case for RAID5 - just remember small write on RAID5=2 reads+2 writes on disks. > The question is what port multiplier hardware does FreeBSD 7 support? it unfortunately doesn't. but your hardware RAID controllers drive disks by itself and presents virtual drives to system, and system has nothing to do with it. so ask manufacturer if it supports port multipliers.