From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 03:13:55 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9A5B216A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0F2C943D1D; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:13:54 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0BBDaOl009730;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:13:52 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:08:24 +0100."
             <20040111120824.00cb6314@Magellan.Leidinger.net> 
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:13:36 +0100
Message-ID: <9729.1073819616@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@freebsd.org>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Future of RAIDFrame and Vinum (was: Future of RAIDFrame) 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:13:55 -0000

In message <20040111120824.00cb6314@Magellan.Leidinger.net>, Alexander Leidinge
r writes:

>I'm a little bit confused. I've read Pouls mail as an suggestion to
>remove vinum from -current and let people modify it in the perforce
>repository. If I got this wrong, please tell me and everything is fine,
>but if I got it right, do you (Greg) agree to remove it from -current?

My proposal is to do just that with both vinum and raidframe until
one or possibly both are up to full strength again.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.