Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:30:39 -0400
From:      Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@deepcore.dk>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Broadcom ServerWorks HT-1000 support in OpenBSD
Message-ID:  <45368EEF.2000709@rogers.com>
In-Reply-To: <4476DB03.40802@deepcore.dk>
References:  <20060525153743.268850@gmx.net> <4476C3EB.30105@FreeBSD.org>	<4476D7FD.2070006@gneto.com> <4476DB03.40802@deepcore.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Søren Schmidt wrote:
> Martin Nilsson wrote:
>>
>> Are you working on supporting the MMIO mode for SATA? (the one used 
>> by Linux - which does not support IDE mode!) There is also a really 
>> nice RAID mode (for a non HW-raid solution!) that depends on a binary 
>> blob from Broadcom available only for Linux/Windows.
>
> I have proper PATA support done, and SATA MMIO mode is also working in 
> a proof of concept mode here, the problem beeing lack lack of decent 
> docs.
> I'll look at the RAID stuff when I have the HW support licked, it 
> should be an easy job adding support for it to ataraid. 

I understand that this is still a work in progress. Would running 
FreeBSD on a SCSI server (HP ProLiant DL385 G2) with the currently 
unsupported Serverworks HT-2100 Northbridge and HT1000 Southbridge 
chipset have any negative effects in terms of performance/stability?





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45368EEF.2000709>